Firstly and most importantly, Designs that exhibit low coupling and high cohesion are preferred.
coupling就是两个class之间的相关程度,所以越低越好。
Figure 1b provides an alternate design involving the same modules. In this case, module A depends upon module B which in turn depends on module C. In this case, if module C changes, the software developer need only first consider if changes to module B are necessary. If no changes to module B are needed, the developer need not consider module A. The design in Figure 1b exhibits lower coupling (dependencies) between the modules than the design shown in Figure 1a.
//I am not too sure right now, but I will renew it in the future!
cohesion就是一个class内method关联程度,所以越高越好
so high cohesion is better, which meets single responsibility principal
举个栗子,HairSalon Class里面有两个field,一个是bookings,一个是specialists. 这两者并没有直接的关系所以放在同一个class里面会显得非常奇怪并且导致low cohesive(会有很多没什么关联的method)。所以我们要把这两个field分开成两个class为了满足 Single Responsibility Principle
(The Single Responsibility Principle indicates that each class should be centered around one cohesive concept)
本文发布于:2024-01-27 21:42:38,感谢您对本站的认可!
本文链接:https://www.4u4v.net/it/17063629622805.html
版权声明:本站内容均来自互联网,仅供演示用,请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系,我们将在24小时内删除。
留言与评论(共有 0 条评论) |